Which dApp build path fits your first release?
3 user actions come first: send the path a person should complete. We use it to choose the right build path. Options include a new frontend, wallet integration around existing contracts, or a data layer for activity views.
Choose based on what is ready. If contracts exist, share their interfaces and network details. If not, we can define frontend and contract dependencies together. The first review records user actions, open decisions and milestone checks.
| Build path | Choose it if | First check |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend first | The product path is clear and screens need implementation | User actions and design materials |
| Wallet integration | Contracts exist and users need to interact with them | Network, contract interface and transaction states |
| Data layer | Screens need history, search or combined records | Required fields and their source |
A dApp can combine all 3 paths, but the order matters. We identify the dependency that could block the first usable flow. Then we place that work early. For related engineering, compare smart contract development or the wider Web3 development offer.
3 build passes from action map to working interface
3 passes keep frontend, wallet behavior and data needs on the same product path. First, we confirm the user actions. Next, we connect the required services. Then we check completed flows against agreed criteria.
- Map the actions: We list what users do, what the chain handles and what the interface must show.
- Connect the pieces: We implement screens, wallet requests and contract reads or writes in the plan.
- Check the result: We review pending, rejected and completed transaction states. We also check the required data views.
- Prepare handoff: We document delivered components, known dependencies and ownership points.
Each pass gives you something concrete to review. You can comment on a flow or screen. You won't need to rely on a general progress note. If the product also needs a public-facing project site, align its messaging through Web3 website development.
We keep decisions visible as the work moves forward. A changed contract interface or user action gets recorded against its acceptance check. You can see which work stays as planned. You can also spot what needs a fresh decision before implementation continues.
5 inputs we need before implementation
5 inputs help us map the build without guessing about user behavior or contract readiness. Send what you have. Mark open decisions clearly. We can then separate confirmed requirements from questions.
- User path: The 3 main actions someone should complete in the dApp.
- Network: The chain or networks the product is intended to use.
- Contract status: Existing addresses, interface files or a note that contracts are still being built.
- Design material: Screens, a prototype, design system or frontend repository, if available.
- Data views: The history, records or contract values each screen needs to display.
A short outline is enough to begin. For token-related products, include deployment status and contract details. See token creation and deployment if that work remains open. If users also need a separate wallet product, compare requirements with crypto wallet development.
These inputs help us identify blockers before milestones are agreed. For example, a screen may depend on transaction history. That screen needs a defined source for the history.
The first review records the dependency and the visible state users should see if data is unavailable. You do not need to settle every technical choice before sending the outline.
How do review windows fit a dApp build?
Review windows follow working product areas, not arbitrary calendar promises. We set a review point for the first user flow, wallet behavior and required data views. Then we confirm the sequence against your dependencies.
| Review window | What we check | What you send or review |
|---|---|---|
| Flow review | The main route through the dApp | User actions, copy and screen feedback |
| Wallet review | Connection, network and transaction states | Contract interface and expected wallet behavior |
| Data review | Required fields, history and loading states | Example records and source details |
| Handoff review | Agreed components and ownership notes | Final comments and receiving-team contact |
The written plan sets the first review window and its readiness checks. You can send feedback on a named screen, transaction state or data view. For a mobile interface, we can map shared behavior separately through Web3 mobile app development.
Our default reply time is 1 working day. Work starts within 24 hours of confirmed payment. The written plan sets the review cadence. You can see what is ready and which input we still need.
Before launch: 3 dependencies to clear
3 dependencies deserve a final check: contract behavior, wallet handling and the source behind each displayed data view. We record them beside the acceptance checks. Your team can then see what the dApp relies on after handoff.
- Contract readiness: Confirm the interface and network details used by the agreed user actions.
- Wallet states: Check the product response to a rejected request, network mismatch or pending transaction.
- Data ownership: Identify the source for each view and who monitors it after release.
Wallet providers can change their behavior. External indexing services can have downtime, incomplete data or compatibility changes. We can verify the agreed integration and interface states, but cannot control those third-party conditions or promise future availability.
For the final review, we log the checked flows, data views and remaining dependencies in the handoff notes.
Your team gets a practical record to maintain, not a vague completion message. Send us your user path, network and contract status. We’ll review those 3 inputs and return a written quote after the review.
How it works
- Send the user pathShare the main actions, target network and current contract status. Add any screens, designs or code you already have.
- Review the dependenciesWe check wallet behavior, data needs and contract interfaces. You receive a written plan with milestones and acceptance checks.
- Confirm the buildWe agree which frontend, wallet and indexing work belongs in the first release. The plan confirms the included work.
- Build and reviewWe implement the agreed product path and show review points for screens, transaction states and data views.
- Check and hand offYou review the completed flows and receive handoff notes covering delivered components, dependencies and ownership.
Frequently asked questions
What should I send before requesting dApp development?
3 useful items are the main user actions, target network and contract status. Add interface files, addresses, designs or example data views if you have them. If a decision is still open, label it clearly. We’ll record it as a question during the first review, not treat it as a requirement.
Can you build around contracts our team already has?
Existing contracts: yes, they can be the starting point. Send the interface files, addresses and relevant networks. Include the actions users should take. We review how the frontend reads from or writes to those contracts. Then we document wallet states and acceptance checks for the agreed product path.
Does every dApp need indexing?
Indexing: no, not for every dApp. A dApp that only needs current contract values may read them directly. Searchable history, combined records or activity views can call for indexing. We decide from the screens and data fields your users need. Then we note the source for each view in the build plan.
What affects the timeline for a dApp build?
Review windows follow product areas and dependencies, not a fixed calendar promise. A frontend with ready contracts needs different work from a build with undecided user flows or data sources. We set milestones after reviewing your inputs. Then we show what is ready at each agreed checkpoint.
Can one dApp support more than one network?
Multiple networks: yes, when contracts and user flows are clear for each one. Send the network list and available contract details. We map which screens and wallet states can be shared. We also identify where separate handling is needed before agreeing on the implementation plan.
What does the final dApp handoff include?
Handoff: the agreed application components and notes on dependencies and ownership. We also log the checked user flows, wallet states and data views. Your team can see what was reviewed. Remaining third-party or contract dependencies are identified for follow-up after release.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…